<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bric Rods &#187; Conversions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bricrods.com/category/conversions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bricrods.com</link>
	<description>Real Automobile Work With a Twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 23:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hydraulic Clutch Conversion</title>
		<link>http://bricrods.com/2009/12/hydraulic-clutch-conversion/</link>
		<comments>http://bricrods.com/2009/12/hydraulic-clutch-conversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drivetrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clutch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[header clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic clutch conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mach 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[master cylinder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slave cylinder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bricrods.com/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This particular post deals with installing a hydraulic clutch on an old Z-bar (equalizer bar) car.  The old style mechanical linkage, though reliable, has one inherent problem &#8211; it takes up too much room in the engine compartment.  This is explained a bit in this post which tells about the design of Mustangs in accordance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular post deals with installing a hydraulic clutch on an old Z-bar (equalizer bar) car.  The old style mechanical linkage, though reliable, has one inherent problem &#8211; it takes up too much room in the engine compartment.  This is explained a bit in <a title="this post" href="http://bricrods.com/2009/12/a-bit-on-rack-and-pinions/" target="_self">this post</a> which tells about the design of Mustangs in accordance with their particular engine displacement.  To summarize however, this 1970 Mach 1 needs more room for headers with better flow, and to this effect a rack and pinion was installed, and then a hydraulic clutch was intsalled.  There are a few ways one can go about this, which include putting in race-bred throwout bearings (slave cylinders), installing a later model Ford slave cylinder from the likes of a &#8216;94 pickup, or by taking the route we took here, which involved the use of (I know sacrilege) GM parts.</p>
<p>First allow the comparison of pros and cons among the differing systems.  To go with a race bred bearing is pricey, with kits costing close to $500.  The bearing itself is close to 200 for a cheap one.  Also, it involves specific master cylinder applications and is mostly difficult for parts procurement short of ordering them and waiting for their arrival.</p>
<p>In reference to the Ford stock parts, it involves the use of a plastic mounting surface for the slave cylinder, and would involve the replacement of the input shaft bearing on the trans.  This could prove detrimental to the overall reliability of the transmission, and was not an option of choice as a result.</p>
<p>The third option, though frowned upon by purists, is one with sound reasoning.  The GM system used on &#8216;88 vintage full size trucks involved the use of an external slave cylinder, and a common master cylinder.  What this means is that with a simple bracket, fabricated and bolted to the bellhousing, and a slight extension of the clutch fork, one can install this system on any vehicle.  A couple bubble flare fittings and two flare fittings along with some brake line with a built in flex point allows the connection between slave and master cylinders, and a simple bleeding of the line produces a dramatic reduction in pedal pressure, as well as increased clearance in the engine compartment for the headers to be routed.  Thus, the primary objective is achieved, and for a grand total of roughly $120.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bricrods.com/2009/12/hydraulic-clutch-conversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A bit on Rack and Pinions</title>
		<link>http://bricrods.com/2009/12/a-bit-on-rack-and-pinions/</link>
		<comments>http://bricrods.com/2009/12/a-bit-on-rack-and-pinions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[header clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mustang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rack and pinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rack and pinion conversion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bricrods.com/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the onset of winter in Illinois, it is time to tackle some long-running modifications to one of the constants in the shop, the old 1970 Mach 1.  First allow me to explain a few inherent problems with the Mach.  The biggest problem (and biggest asset interestingly) is the big 385 series 429 in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the onset of winter in Illinois, it is time to tackle some long-running modifications to one of the constants in the shop, the old 1970 Mach 1.  First allow me to explain a few inherent problems with the Mach.  The biggest problem (and biggest asset interestingly) is the big 385 series 429 in the engine compartment.  For those of you unfamiliar with the Mustang chassis, they were produced specific to the engine installed, i.e. if it was manufactured for a 302, the engine compartment was sized accordingly, if for a 428, or other big block, the shock towers were modified to accept the larger width.  In the case of the only Mustangs to get the 429, the Boss 429, the whole front end was modified by an outside contractor to fit the monstrous engine.</p>
<p>Back to the point though, is the fact that this Mach was originally a 351 car, and so the shock towers were cut down at some point to accommodate the big block.  Unfortunately, this was done some time ago and was not done specifically for the 385 series engine, which causes problems procuring headers.  It is to this end that a rack and pinion was desired, to allow for more room in the engine compartment to design headers with better flow.</p>
<p>First off was the removal of the old steering components, including the gearbox, the center link, ad all the tie rods.  Next on the agenda was the fabrication of brackets to install the rack and pinion itself, making sure that it was low enough to clear the oil pan, an issue with tis larger engine.  Also of note is the retention of the rear steering, rather than a full on conversion to front steering components.  once the brackets were fabricated out of steel, with solid aluminum bushings for the rack to eliminate any movement, thee measurements had  to be taken for the overall length of the rack.  This turned out to be a bit long, and short of ordering a custom (and more expensive) rack, we simply machined the threads farther up the rod ends and cut off teh ends to shorten it up a bit, roughly 1.5 inches.  Once this was done, the daunting task of assembling a linkage to the steering column was tackled.  This involved lengthening the stock shaft by about 9 inches, cutting off the end of the steering column that protrudes into the engine bay for added angular clearance, and assembling the knuckles.  All told, this is fairly simple, just a matter of measuring the distances and drilling a few retention holes in the DD bar.  Of note is the fact that we used a short pinion rack to allow for the most clearance.</p>
<p>A summary of parts is simply this &#8211; rack and pinion, two knuckles, a length of DD rod &#8211; 3/4 inch, and a couple Mustang II outer tie rod ends.  That&#8217;s really all it takes.  Of course, this still needs to be road tested, and a bearing may need to be installed at the base of the steering column to maintain alignment, but that remains to be seen.  Currently there appears to be very little slop in the system and so it will be left as is for now.  Parts total was just upward of $500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bricrods.com/2009/12/a-bit-on-rack-and-pinions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Mustang T5 Conversion</title>
		<link>http://bricrods.com/2009/05/early-mustang-t5-conversion/</link>
		<comments>http://bricrods.com/2009/05/early-mustang-t5-conversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drivetrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8" swap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early mustang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eight inch swap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[five lug swap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspension upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T5 conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v8 swap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bricrods.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently in the shop is a 65 Mustang. Originally a straight six car with a three speed on the floor, deluxe interior and as everyone with an old mustang knows, four lug wheels to go with the six.  The story begins when the owner decided that he wanted a new set of tires, and since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently in the shop is a 65 Mustang. Originally a straight six car with a three speed on the floor, deluxe interior and as everyone with an old mustang knows, four lug wheels to go with the six.  The story begins when the owner decided that he wanted a new set of tires, and since he didn&#8217;t want to maintain the four lug wheels with his new tires, he bought aftermarket mag 500&#8217;s and new tires for the car, Cooper Cobra radials. 195&#8217;s in the front and 225&#8217;s in the back, courtesy of the local tire Guru, Jimmy&#8217;s Tire and Auto out of Galesburg, Illinois.</p>
<p>So begins the saga of converting a 65 Stang to a V8 five speed with tighter suspension and beefier steering components.  To shorten the story a bit, more or less a list of parts will be following along with specialty equipment necessary for installation; omitted will be the drawbacks and mistakes along the way.</p>
<p>Now, the owner had the desire to do this on the cheap, so I did a lot of Junkyard crawling, which can be omitted in favor of buying the parts if one desires to spend the money.  First off a 289 was obtained from an undisclosed source found in the local classifieds, unknown cam specs , flat top pistons, newly rebuilt heads with hardened valve seats, a must for unleaded gasoline, new pushrods, and it is a hydraulic, flat-tappet cam. A new oil pump and drive were obtained, along with a water pump, used pulleys, and alternator, and the other necessities to make it run.</p>
<p>Behind this is bolted a T5 world class trans from a 92 mustang, check the code on the trans, there are more WC T5&#8217;s than got bolted to 5.0 mustangs.  In order to make this fit however, the input shaft had to be turned down on the splines, and the bearing guide had to be turned down; best to check this measurement on a per case basis.  Between the two is an 11 inch clutch and the matching flywheel, though the money saved there is spent on a scattershield from lakewood when you could get a 10.5&#8243; flywheel and clutch and use a standard T5 5.0 bellhousing, saving a smidge over the other combo.  In order to keep the stock lever style clutch a linkage was fabricated in this case, including the equilizer bar and some custom fitting of a 68 upper clutch rod.  This can take a while, or can be ordered as well.</p>
<p>A Crossmember was fabricated from tube and sheet stock for the trans, allowing for custom height to be obtained, in this case as close to the floorboards as possible.  From a six to 8 also requires a three core radiator, best obtained through a dealer, their suppliers are able to adhere to time constraints, or as in this case the local radiator shop.  Add a flex fan and spacer with a few hoses and that is done. Don&#8217;t forget the antifreeze, that is a necessity.</p>
<p>In the rear we obtained an 8&#8243; rear from a 68 stang, which is a bit wider than the original, adding a bit to the stance.  Keep that in mind for tire sizing.  New leaf springs and shackles here, along with rebuilt drum brakes (like I said, cheap).  And to couple that to the front is a junkyard driveshaft shortened to 49&#8243; courtesy of the local machine shop and a T5 slip yoke installed, also from the yard.</p>
<p>Stay tuned for the front end rebuild!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bricrods.com/2009/05/early-mustang-t5-conversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
